The guide · comparison
The three-model stack.
Three frontier models dropped in one week: Claude Opus 4.7, Kimi K2.6, and GPT-5.5. Most people pick one and move on. That's the wrong move. The actual win is routing each task to the right model — five seconds of routing per task cuts cost without losing quality on most workflows. This doc strips out the hype and gives you the practical setup, plus three system prompts to install.
The full comparison + system prompts
🔒 Drop your email to reveal the full setup
Get the full setup, free.
Drop your email and the setup unlocks instantly, plus every other guide and resource in the library. One email a week, unsubscribe anytime.
Setup
Three frontier models dropped in one week:
- April 16: Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic)
- April 20: Kimi K2.6 (Moonshot AI, open weights)
- April 23: GPT-5.5 (OpenAI)
Most people pick one and move on. That's the wrong move. The actual win is routing each task to the right model.
My honest take upfront: the "300 parallel agents, 4,000 coordinated steps, replace a team of four" framing is mostly marketing. The real value is more boring and more useful — each model is genuinely best at different things, and switching between them cuts cost without losing quality on most workflows. That's worth setting up. The agentic swarm stuff is real but fragile; treat it as bonus, not core.
The only rule that matters
| Task | Model | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Bulk coding, scaffolding, overnight runs, batch generation | Kimi K2.6 | Cheapest by a lot, open weights, strong on long-horizon coding. |
| Production code, vision, legal/enterprise docs, anything precision-sensitive | Claude Opus 4.7 | Leads on SWE-Bench Pro and most real-world code quality tests. |
| Math, deep web research, computer use / GUI navigation | GPT-5.5 | Leads on FrontierMath, Terminal-Bench 2.0, OSWorld-Verified. |
Five seconds of routing per task. That's the whole strategy.
What each model actually is
Kimi K2.6 (the cheap workhorse)
- Released: April 20, 2026, open weights under modified MIT.
- Pricing: ~$0.60 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens (roughly 8x cheaper than Opus).
- Architecture: 1T total parameters, 32B active per token, 256k context.
- Strengths: long-horizon coding, agent swarm coordination, front-end generation from sketches, native video input.
- Weaknesses: lags on single-turn high-stakes reasoning, weaker on math (GPQA, AIME) than GPT-5.5, vendor jurisdiction matters for some compliance contexts.
Claude Opus 4.7 (the senior engineer)
- Released: April 16, 2026.
- Pricing: $5 input / $25 output per 1M tokens.
- Strengths: leads SWE-Bench Pro at 64.3% (~6 pts ahead of Kimi and GPT-5.5), strong vision, best-in-class on legal and enterprise documents, fewer errors than its predecessor on source-grounded work.
- Weaknesses: expensive, slightly weaker on web research vs GPT-5.5.
GPT-5.5 (the researcher and operator)
- Released: April 23, 2026.
- Pricing: $5 input / $30 output per 1M tokens (Pro: $30/$180).
- Context: 1M tokens in API.
- Strengths: leads on Terminal-Bench 2.0 (82.7% vs Opus 69.4%), OSWorld-Verified for computer use (78.7%), FrontierMath, long-context retrieval.
- Weaknesses: per Artificial Analysis, hallucination rate is significantly higher than Opus 4.7 on AA-Omniscience. Loses to Opus on real-world code quality.
How to actually set this up
Three options, ranked by effort.
Option 1: Manual routing (free, works today)
Three questions before every task:
- Bulk coding or autonomous work? → Kimi
- Production-perfect, vision, or legal? → Opus 4.7
- Math, web research, or computer use? → GPT-5.5
That's it. Five seconds per task. Most people stop here and that's fine.
Option 2: Claude Code Router
Run Claude Code's interface but route requests to whichever model fits.
- Repo: github.com/musistudio/claude-code-router
- Lets you keep the Claude Code agent loop and swap the brain underneath.
- Routes through OpenRouter so you can hit Kimi, GPT-5.5, or any model with one config.
Option 3: Auto-routing service
coderouter.io automatically picks the model per API call. No configuration. Useful if you don't want to think about routing at all and you trust someone else's heuristics.
Repos worth bookmarking
Cutting the original list down to what actually matters.
For Kimi K2.6:
github.com/moonshotai/Kimi-K2official repo, weights, deployment guidesgithub.com/chongdashu/cc-kimi-k2-thinking-promptsuse Kimi through Claude Code's CLI by swapping one env var
For Opus 4.7:
github.com/Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-promptsfull Claude Code system prompt + 24 built-in tool descriptions
For routing across all three:
github.com/musistudio/claude-code-routersingle interface, three brainsgithub.com/asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaksleaked system prompts for all three models, useful for understanding how each company shapes behaviour
The other repos in the original article are mostly noise. These five cover 90% of what you'll actually use.
Three system prompts to install
One per model. Save somewhere accessible. Paste at session start or set as a persistent system prompt.
For Kimi K2.6 (bulk work and agents)
For Claude Opus 4.7 (production work)
For GPT-5.5 (research and computer use)
What to actually do this week
Don't overthink the setup. Pick one workflow you do often, route it, see if quality holds.
Day 1
Sign up for the Kimi API at platform.moonshot.ai. Run one task you'd normally give Opus through Kimi instead. Compare output. (Most likely outcome: 80% as good for 12% of the cost on that task.)Day 2
Add the three system prompts above to your tool of choice (Cursor, Claude Code, ChatGPT custom instructions, whatever).Day 3
Pick one bulk task you've been putting off (research, scaffolding, batch generation). Run it through Kimi overnight. Review in the morning.Day 4–7
Use the routing table. Notice when you reach for the wrong model out of habit.That's it. No "your workflow is permanently different" promises. Just: you'll spend less, and you'll have the right tool for each kind of work.
Original guide by Artem Novitckii. More from him on Instagram, in the Skool community, and across his resource library.